Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 11:23:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 65D0DBDE5E21EEB22F3E0FB6D378AA6F25F53F579FEA1A33CB4DAF8EAB2F61C8
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details