Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 14:47:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 56F1A849E9E96A293C5E46C00EC195DA708048183D12C0B9D95D7F5CC2FFD1AC
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details