Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 10:22:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4D69BDDAED8FD8E1B8CF5AEB1F3D117DD807E8D68D27D1DADF1BDA2F664C39A0
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details