Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 03:30:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 43E3E54AF97266FDE0B1B3AE65F4D2974331E90531D75A54C6BFBA4182E5E601
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details