Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 19:46:58 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 43D82BEC34ED21F7B1A157B6CF910F1DFE3DE1A16760A4E1EA02AD658D11AFC2
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details