Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 16:02:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3EDB27FFA82D6C456C014DC311EC00F75259242F656A0FC1B6646DC1C6D1ECBB
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details