Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 20:10:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3D3A5AC1930D5CDC80BE1A5C20642A8F53D3E1283B11180931E40D9FCFDC246B
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details