Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 22:31:26 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3B7A352B0C49B157BCA6CC4FEB508FB27B80CFC9CDC3B6C6C11CB726A2C4740B
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details