Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 14:02:12 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3B3B7DED47BEB6E8B42E3354C10A38FC0CC49057664F6D46C6E435B13F63968B
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details