Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 12:04:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 39780D73F887E6C21AF087906E21B87D775930932CA6E517FFD8F140C2C9B8BA
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details