Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 06:06:07 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 37C279B16283E13ABAE42A27A8321AAD4DC9BA8E352ACC99E0C890F8CE165E3C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details