Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-19 11:31:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 164A013C9EA5FBC4DDB7F32B743E068CB7772EA1E1D86F686F42B3AF4D67A2F9
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details