Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-18 16:02:47 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 162A7F3CFD2F7CB64483C9F46E5E2709120A50C099790A1A382F1BE3DE7367FB
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details