Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 17:18:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0C7E38805719916BD1824D7466C8E4D2613A1681B52BBE612AC60324BEB930E0
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details