Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-02-15 02:20:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 07D6D4F0781DB8A4F307FEEF99C8F03A85876F651E2E5A1B4A7F9F6220D9B82D
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details