Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 23:44:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 07C194E12F2733217DDC1669125AB5BA43575A8781F8C88FCFB15ED4C2A8033C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The poster omitted salient and important facts that give context to the court judgement. The defendant was convicted of breaching a Public Spaces Protection Order, not for praying per se. He entered a 'protected space', a buffer zone, outside an abortion clinic unlawfully https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/part/4/chapter/2/crossheading/public-spaces-protection-orders
All Note Details