Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 11:04:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D08E9AB250D23C2AE56687CD0C6DE345E1813C05534E4578E5667FD43EADD25C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - there is nothing factually incorrect in the post. OP did not make claims about population density.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846456910096241138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D08E9AB250D23C2AE56687CD0C6DE345E1813C05534E4578E5667FD43EADD25C
  • createdAtMillis - 1729076656677
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846456910096241138D08E9AB250D23C2AE56687CD0C6DE345E1813C05534E4578E5667FD43EADD25C