Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 05:36:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FE493D476AED42023F167701EC0020E65761B0044DAE606B1DF97665392C682C
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details