Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 19:15:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E74A2ADD8BD2744BAB19C841CB2D0B5A83D961FFD4B06DF10AEA7E0F21A0395A
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details