Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 08:15:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CA849D3A5C8626B5890DA47FC1C9CD73C2E5CB233BA2C27C4A59C514C3EC1C7F
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details