Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 04:54:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C5436195B80F0B040CB585CA0E4A8BED34E6FB47DBE0A6BA7738BE3EBA4C70C3
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details