Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 14:08:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C387FA6461AFD228518B9FAC6D5A3A5E0C9AE9015B2E27E2AD6E4E4BB3381812
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details