Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 18:15:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B39F4868B929424D731EF414BE5ED7F92EA52D9FDB0C66C0E1C5229245BDE43C
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details