Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 07:42:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 79F3063630CF1553C5DB269B843CB70A5C13D0F458B47B2C274B86CD49D6A3DD
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details