Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 04:35:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71D2F4AD63A4ACA483950050A4EA86EF7744BCF5FC07CD8332478A061F22B58D
Participant Details

Original Note:

In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846401572898853051
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71D2F4AD63A4ACA483950050A4EA86EF7744BCF5FC07CD8332478A061F22B58D
  • createdAtMillis - 1729053342021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184640157289885305171D2F4AD63A4ACA483950050A4EA86EF7744BCF5FC07CD8332478A061F22B58D