Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 04:52:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 421ED47C47B8FD90E219D8636EFE1CE8DCC3BB468ADBA6F8B3A2CE2F8214C4C7
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details