Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-16 13:27:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 270D467521E5A7A0E2FEBCD6FE2BEB3FB9E65DCE0033D209F296B3ED6D9C9BDA
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details