Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-17 14:10:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1B7C357ED4DE7B56839B4D9EC28E0DF8548E47D6F7FFB5336F4FC313E64E9F02
Participant Details
Original Note:
In its statement on the resolution, the US ambassador stated they opposed the resolution because it "does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger" and provided no definition of what was meant by a "right to food", among other disagreements. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/
All Note Details