Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 05:23:31 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04A6832A408E205707E3F7FABCD7E255249DA53FB696F5D683FF6099E9199230
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Setting aside the bad typo, the above note is totally unnecessary. The post doesn't try to claim polymarket = opinion polling. It also clearly shows we are looking at Polymarket, not Realclearpolitics or 538 etc.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846399691757703626
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04A6832A408E205707E3F7FABCD7E255249DA53FB696F5D683FF6099E9199230
  • createdAtMillis - 1729056211482
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184639969175770362604A6832A408E205707E3F7FABCD7E255249DA53FB696F5D683FF6099E9199230