Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 04:20:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 283058560B37FF975E2B770FD3878FC7AC6E7B9B4BA277C6F719A27B2A4B2AC1
Participant Details

Original Note:

La proposición (afirmación) presente constituye una falacia de generalización apresurada. En vez de argumentar en favor o no de la toma se desvía la atención hacia un encuesta no representativa para no dar la argumentación que corresponde en el caso. Fuente: https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalizaci%C3%B3n_apresurada

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846350844997816345
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 283058560B37FF975E2B770FD3878FC7AC6E7B9B4BA277C6F719A27B2A4B2AC1
  • createdAtMillis - 1729052452141
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846350844997816345283058560B37FF975E2B770FD3878FC7AC6E7B9B4BA277C6F719A27B2A4B2AC1