Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 21:04:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E274CD5E8DE4A261A1DB37E5A29F7D0B4243C9F991FDC08E900BB4E74C6F396
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cut material can hypothetically be considered as canon on a case-by-case basis as it's not a hard and fast rule on all canons in fiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846291958559347192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E274CD5E8DE4A261A1DB37E5A29F7D0B4243C9F991FDC08E900BB4E74C6F396
  • createdAtMillis - 1729026279937
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18462919585593471920E274CD5E8DE4A261A1DB37E5A29F7D0B4243C9F991FDC08E900BB4E74C6F396