Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 20:26:17 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 253D26D0CB9088CC5B4E77DB5D48BDE0037D1AC95A9354FED0A18AE8B59B6AA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The link shows an accusation, but it has not been proven that Virginia violated the Act. This is the governors opinion that they did not violate the act and even if they did, that law has been on the book for years, so why now?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846191552231596085
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 253D26D0CB9088CC5B4E77DB5D48BDE0037D1AC95A9354FED0A18AE8B59B6AA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1729023977516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846191552231596085253D26D0CB9088CC5B4E77DB5D48BDE0037D1AC95A9354FED0A18AE8B59B6AA1