Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 00:10:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8E19507B2F0F784953DA53D9574589DF599A220A5B1D68023421697A5E22031
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reversal of burden of proof. If the 1st allegations are true, where are the sources that prove it? Otherwise, anyone can claim anything without proof. It is worth mentioning in the context of the notes who is making these types of unfounded allegations until proven otherwise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846122074261410179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E8E19507B2F0F784953DA53D9574589DF599A220A5B1D68023421697A5E22031
  • createdAtMillis - 1729037419887
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1846122074261410179E8E19507B2F0F784953DA53D9574589DF599A220A5B1D68023421697A5E22031