Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 11:06:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C95EBD8244228DFF8C11CCEEFFA46E8F210C020D403407C162144C7C0E43FC4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reversal of burden of proof. If the 1st allegations are true, where are the sources that prove it? Otherwise, anyone can claim anything without proof. It is worth mentioning in the context of the notes who is making these types of unfounded allegations until proven otherwise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846122074261410179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C95EBD8244228DFF8C11CCEEFFA46E8F210C020D403407C162144C7C0E43FC4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1728990373226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1846122074261410179C95EBD8244228DFF8C11CCEEFFA46E8F210C020D403407C162144C7C0E43FC4C