Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 12:13:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4BDC9C78551993E2554EC741A028013EC4B04E27872E83C9F7F84D0086B91A8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reversal of burden of proof. If the 1st allegations are true, where are the sources that prove it? Otherwise, anyone can claim anything without proof. It is worth mentioning in the context of the notes who is making these types of unfounded allegations until proven otherwise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846122074261410179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4BDC9C78551993E2554EC741A028013EC4B04E27872E83C9F7F84D0086B91A8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1729080789994
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18461220742614101794BDC9C78551993E2554EC741A028013EC4B04E27872E83C9F7F84D0086B91A8E