Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 17:14:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38328AB04F60A630DF825F51D00C9ABDF6C1E10B5124C15987876E95E38967A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reversal of burden of proof. If the 1st allegations are true, where are the sources that prove it? Otherwise, anyone can claim anything without proof. It is worth mentioning in the context of the notes who is making these types of unfounded allegations until proven otherwise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846122074261410179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38328AB04F60A630DF825F51D00C9ABDF6C1E10B5124C15987876E95E38967A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1729012462760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184612207426141017938328AB04F60A630DF825F51D00C9ABDF6C1E10B5124C15987876E95E38967A2