Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 10:11:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B12E1688304E842C6E84F1DC36E4A435405D4F071B4E5E2A4D7BEB921D1ECFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1. Personal Opinion 2. Christopher Rufo shared evidence that refutes NYT's false claim that the plagiarism only involved 500 words https://x.com/realchrisrufo/status/1845939299520598257

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846116513033420946
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B12E1688304E842C6E84F1DC36E4A435405D4F071B4E5E2A4D7BEB921D1ECFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1729073478415
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18461165130334209469B12E1688304E842C6E84F1DC36E4A435405D4F071B4E5E2A4D7BEB921D1ECFD