Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 05:17:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E4444F8F0088C555C9CA2EB5C522E65F666182FEA6886B6ADDEA24ED191DA20
Participant Details

Original Note:

Don’t argue with the “no note needed” comments in your proposed notes, you’re aiming to have this shown alongside the original post. Your note should focus on providing context or correcting factual errors, not making a meta argument about whether or not a note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845971367717752994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E4444F8F0088C555C9CA2EB5C522E65F666182FEA6886B6ADDEA24ED191DA20
  • createdAtMillis - 1728969470836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18459713677177529947E4444F8F0088C555C9CA2EB5C522E65F666182FEA6886B6ADDEA24ED191DA20