Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 06:38:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4095AB692DB2144D08854A0A05B26DAC7EDBBC9F88EAFB6B484E5A47F0E7BED6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Don’t argue with the “no note needed” comments in your proposed notes, you’re aiming to have this shown alongside the original post. Your note should focus on providing context or correcting factual errors, not making a meta argument about whether or not a note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845971367717752994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4095AB692DB2144D08854A0A05B26DAC7EDBBC9F88EAFB6B484E5A47F0E7BED6
  • createdAtMillis - 1728974315691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18459713677177529944095AB692DB2144D08854A0A05B26DAC7EDBBC9F88EAFB6B484E5A47F0E7BED6