Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 05:06:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BA018516EC332E28680E258FF3B15433CF949667D1BD3BF234A69D6295B5957
Participant Details

Original Note:

Don’t argue with the “no note needed” comments in your proposed notes, you’re aiming to have this shown alongside the original post. Your note should focus on providing context or correcting factual errors, not making a meta argument about whether or not a note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845971367717752994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BA018516EC332E28680E258FF3B15433CF949667D1BD3BF234A69D6295B5957
  • createdAtMillis - 1728968770641
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18459713677177529942BA018516EC332E28680E258FF3B15433CF949667D1BD3BF234A69D6295B5957