Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 01:50:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9F69EEC41448D54D385D817C376E2C2D04A67ADD19F0278DC46C5C3924422C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note should be a comment. Explaining that only part of the book was plagiarized from Wikipedia is redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845887368567599459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9F69EEC41448D54D385D817C376E2C2D04A67ADD19F0278DC46C5C3924422C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1728957051150
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845887368567599459E9F69EEC41448D54D385D817C376E2C2D04A67ADD19F0278DC46C5C3924422C6