Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 00:12:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C417FF0C1D5A30ED375E8A412B9E92A57A5395C6A7E6954C6A5E2CDF4AFD9714
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note should be a comment. Explaining that only part of the book was plagiarized from Wikipedia is redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845887368567599459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C417FF0C1D5A30ED375E8A412B9E92A57A5395C6A7E6954C6A5E2CDF4AFD9714
  • createdAtMillis - 1728951128163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845887368567599459C417FF0C1D5A30ED375E8A412B9E92A57A5395C6A7E6954C6A5E2CDF4AFD9714