Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 09:11:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA56598A015D64BE4C27B7E5F782BF8273E35A01DB798940C274AA021F10EB36
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note should be a comment. Explaining that only part of the book was plagiarized from Wikipedia is redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845887368567599459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA56598A015D64BE4C27B7E5F782BF8273E35A01DB798940C274AA021F10EB36
  • createdAtMillis - 1728983469299
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845887368567599459AA56598A015D64BE4C27B7E5F782BF8273E35A01DB798940C274AA021F10EB36