Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 04:00:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 544911CFF5E37B5768CB5DEB1B424E5DB8A65C9F827642E45098875BCE38A7CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note should be a comment. Explaining that only part of the book was plagiarized from Wikipedia is redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845887368567599459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 544911CFF5E37B5768CB5DEB1B424E5DB8A65C9F827642E45098875BCE38A7CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1728964820548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845887368567599459544911CFF5E37B5768CB5DEB1B424E5DB8A65C9F827642E45098875BCE38A7CC