Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 21:46:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 511512A6A57D154A0D380EE1284B0F8E3003DCB7D16766020294A031EF54A2D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note should be a comment. Explaining that only part of the book was plagiarized from Wikipedia is redundant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845887368567599459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 511512A6A57D154A0D380EE1284B0F8E3003DCB7D16766020294A031EF54A2D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1728942385025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845887368567599459511512A6A57D154A0D380EE1284B0F8E3003DCB7D16766020294A031EF54A2D2