Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 01:51:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50CE978843FC430C1FE4B1E40B05B1BE93DFE5754C6159E0E29427F24E5FCE61
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source cited in the note does not show the alleged citation. At any rate, verbatim quotations must include actual quotation marks or else it's plagiarism. A simple citation for the factual claim in the quotation is insufficient.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845865538955735437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 50CE978843FC430C1FE4B1E40B05B1BE93DFE5754C6159E0E29427F24E5FCE61
  • createdAtMillis - 1728957079201
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184586553895573543750CE978843FC430C1FE4B1E40B05B1BE93DFE5754C6159E0E29427F24E5FCE61