Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 11:54:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CDC58FAA3E7252ED6B5F6C8AF2A324FA2A483F055F701427239D29E5FD3AC0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source cited in the note does not show the alleged citation. At any rate, verbatim quotations must include actual quotation marks or else it's plagiarism. A simple citation for the factual claim in the quotation is insufficient.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845865538955735437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CDC58FAA3E7252ED6B5F6C8AF2A324FA2A483F055F701427239D29E5FD3AC0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1728993257204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18458655389557354374CDC58FAA3E7252ED6B5F6C8AF2A324FA2A483F055F701427239D29E5FD3AC0E