Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 13:25:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E51D5B4B9839A51614363EAB41A24849EB795E681E6F79B4EC50A14A2A1945E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Most damningly for the proposed note about the 'legitimacy' of the tents as a military target, the post made no claims at all about the legitimacy of the tents as a military target, mooting its entirely speculative attribution of secondary explosions to munitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845807506599137569
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E51D5B4B9839A51614363EAB41A24849EB795E681E6F79B4EC50A14A2A1945E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1728912341595
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845807506599137569E51D5B4B9839A51614363EAB41A24849EB795E681E6F79B4EC50A14A2A1945E9