Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 13:33:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C50D26A1D9C8C733A961F0F26CF626F85E74B69DF2D240EE9BB335B64F99F6DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Most damningly for the proposed note about the 'legitimacy' of the tents as a military target, the post made no claims at all about the legitimacy of the tents as a military target, mooting its entirely speculative attribution of secondary explosions to munitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845807506599137569
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C50D26A1D9C8C733A961F0F26CF626F85E74B69DF2D240EE9BB335B64F99F6DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1728912815360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845807506599137569C50D26A1D9C8C733A961F0F26CF626F85E74B69DF2D240EE9BB335B64F99F6DC