Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 13:42:18 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5729F5D8E521530050C9D2E1E7ADB2B37830598A5358902AA2C33E2CC0E947B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

On the note: The use of Wayback Machine, in this manner, is not a reliable source for the EXACT duplication of a screen shot of a website as it actually appeared on the archive date. E.g. https://cybercultural.com/p/wayback-machine-vs-screenshots/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845783477200793829
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5729F5D8E521530050C9D2E1E7ADB2B37830598A5358902AA2C33E2CC0E947B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1728913338918
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18457834772007938295729F5D8E521530050C9D2E1E7ADB2B37830598A5358902AA2C33E2CC0E947B9